minimial Xemacs for ESS?

[A.J. Rossini]

>>>>> "rich" == Rich Heiberger <rmh at surfer.sbm.temple.edu> writes:

    rich> I use ordinary latex mode for latex.  Fundamental mode is
    rich> fine for ascii files.  But most likely you aren't editing
    rich> undifferentiated ascii files.  For R you will be using .r
    rich> and .rt .files and will want ESS.  For .tex files, emacs
    rich> automatically puts them in tex-mode or latex-mode (depending
    rich> on the absence or presence of a \documentstyle statement
    rich> near the top).  Similarly most of your files are intended
    rich> for a specific language or package and the mode that would
    rich> be best is the one targeted for that language.

Under XEmacs, I'd install:

AUC-TeX,
Bibtex-mode
ref-tex

for LaTeX.  

-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini at u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini at scharp.org
-------------- http://software.biostat.washington.edu/ ----------------
FHCRC: M: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:   Th: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX
(my tuesday/wednesday/friday locations are completely unpredictable.)



-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
ess-help mailing list -- To (un)subscribe, send
subscribe	or	unsubscribe
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: ess-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._