[ESS] proposal re: underscore
spinuvit at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 22:28:28 CEST 2012
I tend to agree with Jack, it's inconsistent across the modes. And
unless you are using ESS only for R, it's a problem. This is why I am
not using it myself. In any case I think smart-underscore should be
smart-assignment instead, with an ability to be assigned it to any
key. Once assigner to a key "x", pressing "x" twice should do whatever
action was hijacked. I would probably like to assign it to "<". Jack's
C-= idea is not bad ad all as that key is free, easy to type, and has
What others think? May be we should put it to a vote.
>>>> Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug at gmail.com>
>>>> on Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:12:00 +0200 wrote:
> On 04/04/12 19:52, Jack Tanner wrote:
>> Premise: the smart-underscore behavior in ESS is problematic because
> I would not agree here.
>> 1) it's inconsistent across modes, as described in my post a couple of weeks ago and repeated
>> below for convenience
> OK - I can not comment to bugs-mode as I have never used bugs, but it is consistent in R modes.
>> 2) it's confusing to novices, as evidenced by the fact that it's a FAQ
> Well - there are many "problematic" things to remember for a novice - underscore as a very
> convenient one is probably a minor issue.
>> 3) it will be even more confusing to novices over time, because underscore as assignment
>> operator was phased out in R a long time ago
> Sorry - I never heard about "underscore as assignment operator" in R. It must have been a long
> time ago.
>> 4) it requires two keystrokes of underscore to get an actual underscore
> True - but only one to get "<-" ...
>> Proposal: ESS should emulate another R editor on this point, namely StatET. The
> Well - ESS runs in emacs, and emacs has different shortcuts then the other editors - but I see you
> point here.
>> behavior is as follows:
>> 1) typing = gets you =
>> 2) typing _ gets you _
>> 3) typing <- gets you <-
>> 4) (this is the magic one) typing Ctrl+= gets you <-
>> The main argument 'pro' is that 1-3 are not at all confusing to novices, and 4 is a
>> discoverable feature, i.e., a reward for advanced users. Additionally, this would be consistent
>> across S, R, BUGS, and JAGS, and would not violate their syntax, unlike the current behavior
>> (explained in my older note, below).
>> The current smart-underscore could be retained as-is for those who want it but turned off by
>> default in future versions.
> As long as the default behaviour stays as it is, it would be OK.
> I actually see the "_ as <-" as a huge plus of ESS.
>> -- my older email, repeated for reference --
>> 1. In ESS[BUGS] mode, underscore is bound to ess-bugs-hot-arrow, which is definitely wrong,
>> because it doesn't let me create variables like foo_bar.
>> 2. I'd like it if I could use smart-underscore as in ESS[S] mode, but if I do
>> (define-key ess-bugs-mode-map (kbd "_") 'ess-smart-underscore)
>> then there's no smart-underscore behavior, just a plain underscore.
>> ______________________________________________ ESS-help at r-project.org mailing list
More information about the ESS-help