[R-sig-ME] Providing starting values for glmer()
Ben Bolker
bbolker at gmail.com
Wed Jul 23 21:05:41 CEST 2014
On 14-07-23 02:18 PM, Ravi Varadhan wrote:
> Dear Ben,
>
> I would appreciate your help with one more question. How would I
> provide starting values to glmer()? I know it is supposed to be a
> named list, but I don’t know what the names are supposed to be.
[cc'ing to r-sig-mixed models]
In the grand tradition of R help pages, I think the definition of
'start' in the ?glmer page is technically correct if somewhat opaque.
Short answer: the names should be 'theta' and/or 'fixef'.
start: a named list of starting values for the parameters in the
model, or a numeric vector. A numeric ‘start’ argument will
be used as the starting value of ‘theta’. If ‘start’ is a
list, the ‘theta’ element (a numeric vector) is used as the
starting value for the first optimization step (default=1 for
diagonal elements and 0 for off-diagonal elements of the
lower Cholesky factor); the fitted value of ‘theta’ from the
first step, plus ‘start[["fixef"]]’, are used as starting
values for the second optimization step. If ‘start’ has both
‘fixef’ and ‘theta’ elements, the first optimization step is
skipped. For more details or finer control of optimization,
see ‘modular’.
Since you're fitting a logistic model, large parameter estimates (e.g.
|beta|>10) are strongly suspicious of complete separation (consider the
value of `plogis(41,log.p=TRUE)`); large intercept terms are also
diagnostic for continuous predictors that should be centered. The
proximal cause of the convergence warning is most likely that glmer
scales the estimated gradients at the MLE by the estimated curvature
(inverse Hessian); if the surface is really, really flat then the scaled
gradients will be large even if the gradients themselves are OK.
MCMCglmm and blme give fairly straightforward ways to deal with
complete separation (see http://rpubs.com/bbolker/glmmchapter).
Ben Bolker
>
> Here is the model I am trying to fit. As you can see, the model
> does not converge. I would like to look at different starting
> values.
>
>
>
>> summary(mod1 <- glmer(imps79b ~ tx*sweek + (sweek|id),data=schiz,
>> family=binomial))
>
> Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood (Laplace
> Approximation) ['glmerMod']
>
> Family: binomial ( logit )
>
> Formula: imps79b ~ tx * sweek + (sweek | id)
>
> Data: schiz
>
>
>
> AIC BIC logLik deviance df.resid
>
> 1206 1244 -596 1192 1596
>
>
>
> Scaled residuals:
>
> Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
>
> -1.7008 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 1.3310
>
>
>
> Random effects:
>
> Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Corr
>
> id (Intercept) 1143 33.8
>
> sweek 255 16.0 -0.43
>
> Number of obs: 1603, groups: id, 437
>
>
>
> Fixed effects:
>
> Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
>
> (Intercept) 41.54 8.50 4.88 1e-06 ***
>
> tx 5.81 5.12 1.14 0.256
>
> sweek -10.91 3.32 -3.28 0.001 **
>
> tx:sweek -11.93 5.17 -2.31 0.021 *
>
> ---
>
> Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
>
>
>
> Correlation of Fixed Effects:
>
> (Intr) tx sweek
>
> tx -0.823
>
> sweek 0.527 -0.289
>
> tx:sweek -0.734 0.360 -0.922
>
> Warning message:
>
> In checkConv(attr(opt, "derivs"), opt$par, ctrl = control$checkConv,
> :
>
> Model failed to converge with max|grad| = 73.9422 (tol = 0.001,
> component 4)
>
>>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ravi
>
>
>
> Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D. (Environmental Eng.), Ph.D. (Biostatistics)
>
> Associate Professor,
>
> Division of Geriatric Medicine & Gerontology
>
> School of Medicine,
>
> Johns Hopkins University
>
> Ph: 410-502-2619
>
> Email: ravi.varadhan at jhu.edu <mailto:ravi.varadhan at jhu.edu>
>
> http://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/johns-hopkins-center-on-aging-and-health/people/Faculty_personal_Pages/Varadhan.html
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the R-sig-mixed-models
mailing list