[R] R-OT list needed?

[Dirk Eddelbuettel]

On 19 May 2006 at 14:20, (Ted Harding) wrote:
| than you, what that seems to spell out -- maybe "R-Social"
| might be better).

Perfect!  Those with bruises from asking silly or uninformed questions on
r-help can refer to that list as ... R-AntiSocial.

Just kidding. I'd be up for an off-topic list with a more discerning look at
publically fudged and quoted numbers.  Carl Bialik does something related in
his "Numbers Guy" column at the on-line Wall Street Journal, but that
requires a subscription.

Dirk

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison