[ESS] Feature request -- start R automagically
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Sat May 24 14:37:06 CEST 2008
I've fixed the remaining problem.
It seems to me that (save-excursion ..) partially sucks,
but I could achieve the desired behavior using
(switch-to-buffer ..)
AFAICS, R is now started automatically in the two scenarios
that were mentioned in this thread.
--> get ESS [SVN version r3907] from the URL below,
to try it out.
Feedback is welcome,
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Sat, 24 May 2008 13:56:51 +0200 writes:
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>>>>> on Sat, 24 May 2008 10:53:09 +0200 writes:
MM> Salut Vincent, (et al)
>>>>> "VG" == Vincent Goulet <vincent.goulet at act.ulaval.ca>
>>>>> on Fri, 23 May 2008 09:03:41 -0400 writes:
VG> Hi Martin, Le ven. 23 mai à 02:45, Martin Maechler a
VG> écrit :
>>>>>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler
>>>>>>>>> <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> on Fri, 9 May 2008
>>>>>>>>> 17:35:56 +0200 writes:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "MR" == Mathieu Ribatet <mathieu.ribatet at epfl.ch>
>>>>>>>>> on Thu, 08 May 2008 17:37:32 +0200 writes:
>>>>
MR> Dear list, Will it be possible to add the following
MR> request. When running emacs with a R script file (or
MR> any other source
>>>> file) and
MR> trying to C-c C-r a region while no R process is
MR> running, you
>>>> get the
MR> following message "Process R is not running".
>>>>
MR> I think it may be convenient if then ESS propose you to
>>>> launch a new R
MR> process.
>>>>
MM> I agree, and I had added this feature already a few
MM> months ago in a different context (Sweave editing) on
MM> 2007-05-03 { according to lisp/Changelog }.
>>>>
MM> I hope to find time to hack this during the prolonged
>>>> Pentecoste
MM> weekend.
>>>>
>>>> and I did not have time then, but last night.
>>>>
>>>> I've commited a change to ESS' development version
>>>> which automatically starts R if - you are editing an S
>>>> language buffer [ ess-language is "S" ] which should be
>>>> the case for all R source files - if your buffer has no
>>>> associated ess process.
VG> Shouldn't it be "if there is no *running* ess process" ?
MM> well, that's yet another feature request ! :-) which
MM> makes sense, but is not yet implemented.
MM> I'll see if I can implement it "quickly". Martin
MM> It was not quickly, and I don't quite like the result
MM> yet, but seem not to be able to get it working the way I
MM> want (at least not without resorting to horrible hacks).
MM> The current (after you get ESS [ r3905 ] from
MM> https://svn.r-project.org/ESS/trunk/ ) problem is the
MM> following:
MM> Assume an emacs session (in 1 frame) with 2 buffers: Top
MM> buffer : foobar.R Bottom buffer: *R* where you have
MM> executed C-c C-q or q("no")
MM> Now in foobar.R, send a line (C-c C-n) to *R* this now
MM> restarts R quite nicely, *BUT* I end up with - the two
MM> buffers are reversed : *R* is now top, foobar.R is
MM> bottom - Point ("the cursor" / focus) is in the *R*
MM> buffer instead of in foobar.R at the location where I
MM> had sent my line.
MM> This happens inspite of (save-excursion ..) used in many
MM> places. If any good Emacs lisp programmers see a
MM> solution...
MM> Martin
>>>>
>>>> Consequently, this feature will be in ESS 5.3.8
>>>>
>>>> Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
MM> ______________________________________________
MM> ESS-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
MM> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-help
More information about the ESS-help
mailing list