Behavior of C-c C-n
Paul Johnson
pauljohn at ku.edu
Tue May 18 04:59:52 CEST 2004
I don't know if I understand your point. In Windows or Linux with the
newest ESS, C-c C-n causes the current line to run and it advances the
cursor location to the next line in the code. I don't understand what
you mean "would like my R process window to keep up with the current
submitted code."
I see the R commands run in the ESS *R* window.
However, I do see the issue, which I *THINK* was always present in ESS,
that the R session running under ESS does not add the commands to the R
history that are sent over from the R code buffer. So Control-up-arrow
does not cause the ESS *R* buffer to step backwards through the commands
that ESS submitted.
Patrick Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 17-May-2004 at 04:25PM -0400, Martin Henry H. Stevens wrote:
>
> |> Mac OS X 10.3.3
> |> GNU Emacs 21.3.50.1
> |> ESS 5.2.0
> |> R 2.0.0
> |>
> |> When I use C-c C-n to submit a line of R code from my source code
> |> to the R process (and step to the next line), I would like my R
> |> process window to keep up with the current submitted
> |> code. Currently, it does not, yet I know that in other
> |> implementations, this keeping-up by the R process has
> |> occurred. What is "normal" and how might I change this behavior?
>
> It's the same with
>
> GNU Emacs 21.2.1
> ESS 5.2.0
> R 1.9.0
> platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> With previous versions of ESS, it did what you and I prefer. I
> previously used 5.1.23 which did work "properly". I tried the
> ess-5.2.0rc3, for a short time, and it wasn't a problem with it
> either. If the change is intentional, I didn't notice its being
> mentioned (but I'm not all that observant).
>
> I'd also be very interested in learning how to change it back.
>
--
Paul E. Johnson email: pauljohn at ku.edu
Dept. of Political Science http://lark.cc.ku.edu/~pauljohn
1541 Lilac Lane, Rm 504
University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086
Lawrence, Kansas 66044-3177 FAX: (785) 864-5700
More information about the ESS-help
mailing list