[BioC] Recommended gene model for DESeq
Nicolas Delhomme
delhomme at embl.de
Sun Apr 8 14:19:41 CEST 2012
Hi Simon,
These are good sanity checks indeed. I'll add that to my TODO.
Nico
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nicolas Delhomme
Genome Biology Computational Support
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Tel: +49 6221 387 8310
Email: nicolas.delhomme at embl.de
Meyerhofstrasse 1 - Postfach 10.2209
69102 Heidelberg, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------
On 7 Apr 2012, at 16:30, Simon Anders wrote:
> Hi Nico
>
> On 2012-04-07 12:36, Nicolas Delhomme wrote:
>> Another word of caution here: I do not check the unicity of the reads
>> in the bam file. I expect the user to know enough about the aligner
>> (s)he is using for his/her application to decide on that. From the
>> literature it seems that people only retains uniquely mapped reads
>> (for most applications). I could add a sanity check for that.
>
> I've added to htseq-count a check that a read gets skipped if it has tag "NH:i:n" with n>1. However, not all aligner use the NH tag properly, so this is not a full solution. Another possibility is to discard everything with mapping quality below 10, because non-uniquly mapped reads should have a MAPQ<3.
>
> How is life in Umeå?
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list